This page will contain a table of the most important links in this case:
1. Documents regarding lack of Sodini notices:
A. Declaration of ADULT SISTER NO. 1: YB:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwQlFkR05BRk05d28
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwQlFkR05BRk05d28
(declaration redacted for private purposes)
B. GLORIA’S DECLARATION OF NO NOTICE/NO JURISDICTION:
see paragraph 9:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwTGJjSThtazBNTjQ
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwTGJjSThtazBNTjQ
C. Current TABLE OF TORTS
This table is a comprehensive list of all the torts, malfeasance,
misfeasance, theft, embezzlement and other actions conducted by the
miscreants in this Sykes Probate case:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwNGZnY3RWSkFlTVk
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwNGZnY3RWSkFlTVk
D. LIST OF MISSING TRANSCRIPTS, DOCUMENTS AND PLEADINGS IN 09 P 4585!
There are currently 13 large appellate volumes containing complete
sets of pleadings, transcripts and orders missing from the Probate
files. If see anywhere, please contact the court and get them back
there ASAP!
This means MORE THAN HALF THE FILE IS MISSING!
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwZ2JZN0ZlV0t6cEU
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwZ2JZN0ZlV0t6cEU
If missing more than half a huge court file AND lack of Sodini
notices to adult siblings and children isn’t clear evidence of
corruption, cronyism and tampering, I don’t know what is.
Someone is clearly cleansing the file and doing it in a methodical fashion.
The fact that Appellate volumes are missing clearly shows a pattern
to obstruct justice. The rest of the file is poorly organized and it is
difficult to put it in order and make sense of it.
But appellate volumes are unique in that generally all important
documents in the file to date are included, in order and without pages
missing.
If the judge only had the file for about 2 years under lock and key,
and the appellate volumes came back from the court of appeals in early
2011, it does not look good for the court or court insiders, or the
GAL’s who Gloria and Scott say often emerge from out the Judge’s private
areas! How does this happen? The wolves are clearly guarding the
chicken house.
E. COST OF CORRUPTION
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwX09PRHlJbnptMmc
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwX09PRHlJbnptMmc
F. PROOF OF CLAIM — ATTYS FEES RE 09 P 4485
(you can deduct the Target vs. Sykes fees–that was definitely
Predatory Lending–33% are you kidding? I have not been to Target
since. I believe that HSBC was the lender and they’re pure evil! Just
take a look at any Google search on all the crap they have pulled, let
alone the 33% interest they charge.)
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwbnI1T1NvWHotNEk
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6FbJzwtHocwbnI1T1NvWHotNEk
CT and Gloria have expressed an interest in wondering why I publish
“Cost of Corruption” which is considered to consist of 1) My proof of
claim filed with the BK court regarding In Re Sykes (see my forebearance
agreement with Gloria below) and 2) Monthly accounting for my legal
time spent on the Sykes Blog.
Cynthia says that my time spent on the Sykes Blog is not billable and
I can’t bill at attorney rates for it regardless. But the reality is,
it takes an attorney to make those comments and further, I only publish
this blog from a legal standpoint primarily, so yes, it does take an
atty to write, review and publish it, and so atty rates are applicable.
Further, by filing the bogus disqualification against me back in
January of 2010, and then continuing the tort by filing a bogus ARDC
complaint, denying me use of my laptop in court, my grievances against
her and the other miscreants are continually being renewed. And since
she interfered with my representation of Gloria and since Gloria still
does not understand the nuances of the DisQ, the action is continuing
and my losses are continuing. The only way I am left with helping
Gloria and Mary is to run the blog–all else has been and continues to be
interfered with by the miscreants. Hence, running the blog is also my
damages for their tortious actions.
With respect to my deal with Gloria, it is this: I will offer her
forbearance on the following terms: 1) she speaks only in a neutral
manner or better about me publicly or privately; 2) she takes both bills
and files them in her Ad Pro as a “Damages Exhibit” against the
miscreants and helps me collect. She can just black out and redact the
Target stuff.
I will assume that if she believes that I am not going to sue her she has accepted this deal, and this deal only.
2. Amended Petition for Partition
Before any
petition for partition is filed, it is common practice (and common
sense) to do an APPRAISAL to see if the property in question is even
worth partitioning. Did Peter Schmiedel do this? No. There are so many
things in this case that are simply not done correctly. Here is a link
to the Amended Petition for Partition filed by Peter Schmiedel on behalf
of Carolyn Toerpe. Yes readers, this is ACTUALLY filed even before any
appraisal was done. For all they knew, the costs of partitioning could
very easily outweigh the benefits. But since this case is filled with
corruption and incorrect procedures, this misstep went unnoticed by the
Court.
sykes-amended-petition-partition-05-24-12
3. Court Order for CT vs Gloria case number 2010 M1 712719
sykes-FED-courtorder-04-25-12
4. Peter Schmiedel Letter to J. Brodsky 2/24/2010
sykes-PS-to-Brodsky-ltr-02-24-10
5. Adam Stern's List of Documents 2/14/2011
sykes-stern-letter-list-of-doctors-02-14-11
6. Carolyn Toerpe: Objection to Motion to Substitute Judge for Cause 5/7/2009
sykes-probate-05-07-09-PS-06-obj-2Mtnz-subjudge
7. Sykes Property Brown House Title
sykes-property-BrowHouse-title
No comments:
Post a Comment