CLICK HERE to see our Disclaimer




Legal Disclaimer–
Although this is obvious, no person in this blog has been accused of any wrongdoing, crime or even arrested unless stated otherwise from a website reporting actual arrests and convictions. We are stating our opinions and we have the right to do this. Only the particular author is responsible for his or her content. (So don’t blame me if you dislike some posts from someone else.) This site is newsworthy because it is picked up automatically by many other blogs and is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Illinois State Constitution of 1970 and violations will be taken seriously with charges under the Illinois Citizens Participation Act. We ARE participating in government here–we are lawyers trying to make a difference to make things better for grandma and grandpa. We don’t care how much money you’re making–directly or indirectly from Probate or a nursing home or home health care wired-in business. Do yourself a favor and get a different job, it’s not worth it.  And if you’re someone filing ARDC complaints against this blog, we are all exercising our rights to disseminate important news to protect the rights of the elderly and respect their wishes.  Again, go get another job–it’s not worth it.
PS – This blog is primarily for entertainment purposes only and please don’t file any pleadings or documents in court without checking with the sources for errors. No legal blog can take the place of hiring a competent attorney to work on your probate case, and that's why this blog is for entertainment purposes only.  My rate to review is $300 per hour.  Sorry, but portions of this blog have to be entertaining so we can get the word out.  There is most certainly a great deal of (stinging) truth in it, esp. for the GAL’s, the probate court and a society that ignores (thereby condoning) the sleazy world of probate, and in particular the 18th floor of the Daley Center in Chicago, but everyone needs to understand, these are not pleadings, there is no Motion, Response and Reply set by any court, together with extended legal argument recorded by a court reporter and subject to a Motion to Reconsider if errors or new evidence is found.  So don’t take it that way.  Like a good reporter, do your own due diligence and check with the sources first.  
For accurate details, contact the court reporters for copies of transcripts, go to the probate file and pull the pleadings and make your own copies, talk to the people that were there, etc., whatever, just don't write me about how something was not as accurate as you wanted because you got it from this blog.  Also, don't write anyone and tell them that KD is an attorney for Gloria or me or any other attorney wrote something for Gloria that she filed because it may not be true.  Ken and I are posting suggested pleadings that Gloria can use if she wants to use it, but most of the time she just writes her own stuff or gets a paralegal to do it. Unless you see an appearance form filed by an attorney that was accepted by the court, it's none of anyone's business who an attorney represents, gives legal advice to or does not give legal advice to.  All communications to an atty relating to a legal matter which are not publicly disclosed are subject to an attorney client privilege the client may claim at any time.  So, unless it's posted as "pleadings from circuit court" or "transcript from circuit court", the rest are just impressions, feelings, understandings and BS--which is why it is for entertainment purposes only.  Get a lawyer if you have a court case.


Honestly, I have to explain blogs to attorneys?  Have they no life? Do they not know how to email me or use the “comments” section at all?

No comments:

Post a Comment