From Ken Ditkowsky–Reasons for a number of agencies to get involved and Investigate
In Sykes it did not matter whether she was competent or not – it
was a foregone conclusion orchestrated by an agreement between between
[entities] (Gloria received an e mail from [entity] admitting this
fact – I wonder if that e mail was a target of the ‘theft’ of her work
product accomplished by the eviction). However, in reviewing a bunch
of the victim complaints it appears that the medical examination most
notably ignores the following:
1) history
2) body chemistry – i.e. it is possible to drug the subject
3) illness (either physical or mental)
4) consultation with treating doctors (Dr. [X] is reported to have testified that he did not bother to even examine Mary)
The great genius talks to the subject for a few seconds, listens to
the scenario of the possible abuser and/or exploiter and writes a
report. In the report on record in the Sykes case the ‘medical
practitioner’ wrote the Mary was delusional when she described
activities that she actually engaged. He learned that Mary was
imagining from the candidate for plenary guardian who just happened to
be the subject of a pending Petition for a Protective order and had
informed her mother after finding $4000 in her mother’s account that she
was investing the same in an IRA.
Professional Regulation (and the [agencies and authorities]) should
be investigating this situation of ‘rubber stamp’ medicine. The
current procedure in [lega fora] (and in many other states) for the
appointment of a guardian is replete with examples of total avoidance of
all protections for the senior citizen targeted so that there would be
no hindrance by the family of you, me, Gloria, Senator Kirk, President
Obama, et. al to their being declared disabled and having CT appointed
their plenary guardian. No one charged with protecting the
seniors cares! Ask Mr. Wyman, the two Mary’s, Gloria Sykes, Janet
Phelan *****and the hundreds of family and friends of the senior victim.
If a professional complains he/she can expect that he is the
subject of a professional investigation! Even medical professionals
are not immune.
What society needs if it wants to protect its senior citizens is a
complete, honest, and comprehensive investigation of the Sykes case and
similar cases by law enforcement – and enforcement of the law.
Ken Ditkowsky
I agree that the fact that Dr. Shaw wrote down Mary was delusional
because she was doing the following: 1) writing checks and paying
bills, 2) driving and had a driver’s license; 3) walking to her bank and
doctor and then CT lying and saying she wasn’t and Dr. Shaw never
investigating further is very troublesome.
Again, the entire [event] was railroaded, the file was peppered
with packs of lies, and these lies were rubber stamped by [entities] in a
“done deal.”
Scary.
Does anyone have the right to protest against the railroading of
incompetency? Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and history
will tell you that when the government wants to cover up fraud, let the
politically elite steal with impunity, the first thing you do is start
throwing people into mental institutions where they have no right to
counsel or a hearing and the panel is rigged. It works very well in
Banana Republic countries, the mideast and has worked well in the USSR.
Is this the new age of the US? No one can call for an
investigation? Are we all incompetent for suggesting that [entities]
engage in theft? Is this the reason why Chicago-Cook County is easily
the most corrupt area in the US, hands down, a margin of 2 to 1 over the
next most corrupt jurisdictions?
[Agency Entity], please enlighten us on this one. How is it that
numerous attys take good note of strongly suspected [troubles and
issues], but then groundless complaints are lodged against the honest
attorneys–the ones not making a profit from [troubles and problems], and
those complaints are not automatically dismissed and the miscreants
dance away with impunity? You have been sent the record from the trial
court. No discovery, plenty of railroading, the alleged disabled can’t
appear in [person], blah, blah, and yet this continues as an ordinary
snafu of [legal fora].
More good questions than answers, I am afraid.
No comments:
Post a Comment