Dear Readers;
One of the things that bothers me in a most major
respect is how Ken Ditkowsky can be accused of lying about the Sykes
Probate Case when in fact Ms. Black at the ARDC has shown no knowledge
of the facts of the case. It makes it look like she was "told to" file a
complaint against KD without any facts before her.
Now, as an
"ordinary" licensed lawyer, I would get in big trouble for that. No,
let me correct that, HUGE HUGE trouble for that. In federal court they
have Rule 11 where you can be sanctioned if you do not first make a
reasonable investigation of the facts or the BS your client has told
you. In state court, it is a different rule, but nonetheless, an
important rule. Believe it or not, lawyers cannot actually file claims
and lawsuits just based upon pure client BS.
So what is Ms. Black
up to and why is my question to her. She admitted in her answers to
KD's Requests to Admit that she did not have sufficient facts really to
determine if many of the statements made in her complaint against him
were true or untrue.
So, the intrigue continues. I have told her
KD is telling the truth. I know the family and I know Gloria. The
Probate Proceeding was non jurisdictional and railroaded. What
happened?
so please read on below and I will in fact publish all those transcripts on this blog and post a page with links.
take care
joanne
FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET
To:
ARDC
Attn:Lea Black
Fax 312-565-2320 From: Admitted Ill., N. Carolina and Patent Bars
JoAnne M. Denison, Pat. Atty. Reg. No. 34,150
DENISON & ASSOCS., PC FAX 312-553-1307
1512 N Fremont St, #202 CELL PH 773-255-7608
CHICAGO, IL 60642 PHONE 312-553-1300
JoAnne@DenisonLaw.com or www.DenisonLaw.com
Federal Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights
Marianne Buckley, Associate, Of Counsel
Troy Sieburg, Associate, Of Counsel
Important Notice
This facsimilie message contains attorney privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone,
collect, and return the original message to the above address. You will
be reimbursed. Your cooperation is immensely appreciated.
For transmission problems, please call 312-335-1300
A confirmation copy WILL ✔ will NOT be sent.
Pages in fax, including this coversheet - ( 2 + 4 PDF files to come )
May 10, 2012
Re: JoAnne M. Denison , In relation to Cynthia Farenga’s Complaint AND
Kenneth Ditkowsky, the Sykes Probate matter
PLUS my request to open an investigation against Cynthia Farenga, Peter Schmeidel, Adam Stern, Harvey Waller
TRANSMISSION OF TRANSCRIPTS
Dear Ms. Black;
Without waiving my representation by Mr. Ditkowsky, who is aware of this
communication, attached is are portions of the Probate File transcripts
which have been imaged--as promised You will eventually get 16 files,
and I have just ordered the rest to get to you. You should already have
the following documents via fax for the above files:
1. Table of Torts for April 2012, which I will periodically update.
2. Probate file (imaged portion) Dec 1 2011 to April 1 2012 which
contains the improper behavior of Peter Schmeidel, Adam Stern and
Cynthia Farenga which has occurred in Probate Court. It supplements the
“table of torts” which serve as a basis of complaints against these
individuals.
3. Probate file (imaged portion) Mar 2011 to Nov 2011, faxed May 8, 2012.
If you lose or misplace any of the above, these can be easily located at
www.MaryGSykes.com. While I do not think 99% of ARDC complaints need
to or ought to be made public, I am 100% sure that Probate Case No. 2009
P 4585 involving AS, CF, PS and HW is so filled with grave injustices
against Mary G and Gloria, the entire matter MUST and OUGHT to be
published.
Unless and until I have heard that this has been accomplished, I
will work on getting the feds involved, or the court corruption attorney
prosecutors located at 219 S. Dearborn in Chicago. I had to do this
once before in Probate and once I shipped over a packet of info, the
craziness in court all of a sudden stopped. I guess a phone call was
made. That was a great story I will save for another day.
I also wanted to let you know the other day I was in FED Court or
Forcible Eviction and Detainer Court. (True story). This is on the 14th
floor. I can tell you that I have been in this court for clients a
number of times and seen dozens of cases dismissed for lack of proper
jurisdictional notice over those 5 day notes. Yesterday, regrettably I
had to dismiss my client’s case. I didn’t want to waste his time or
money. Unfortunately, my client had a prior lawyer and this lawyer was
told that the eviction case involved a land contract or an agreement to
purchase the property within a certain time period. For some reason,
the lawyer had my client serve a 5 day notice to the tenant as if the
tenancy were on a month to month basis. When we received the file and
noted that both parties agreed in answers to discovery that this was in
fact a land contract arrangement, I had to inform the client that the
law was in land contract situations (there is a separate set of laws for
these apart from the Chicago Landlord Tenant Ordinance), that a 30 day
notice had to be served. Yesterday I had to agree to a non suit.
Oh, I talked to the judge about it, told him the 5 day was served in
good faith, etc., but he was firm that a jurisdictional notice
requirement was strict and severe and required dismissal and he could
not take any action on the subject matter of the case. I understand.
It’s due process and it’s constitutional. The Illinois Supreme Court
has made that clear. There are two cases on this. Read the language I
have outlined. (will fax later today) Due process and notice
jurisdiction is strict and severe.
I don’t like “jurisdictional notice requirements” in Illinois laws
either when I have to withdraw or have one of my cases dismissed and
start all over again. This means if you don’t strictly comply with the
form, content, and method of notice, the court may not take jurisdiction
over a matter. All orders will be void ab initio. All lawyers
involved may incur serious liability, malpractice or otherwise. You get
in the middle of the case, do discovery and find out jurisdiction is
lacking and an honest lawyer informs the court promptly and asks for a
dismissal. I had to do just that yesterday. BUT, they are important
due process and constitutional protections afforded citizens with human
and civil rights. And in the long run, what makes the US great is our
extreme attention and compelling dedication to the protection of human
and civil rights, meaning all due process protections are highly
regarded.
For some reason, the FED judges on the 14th floor understand this
concept, generally carefully reviewing each and every new case to make
sure the 5 day notice was correct and was served strictly in compliance
with the statue. But, then just four floors above in the Probate
division, the judges there for some reason ignore all of it–due process,
proper 14 day service on close family members and do as they please.
Soldini was clear that 14 day notice requirement prior to hearing is
jurisdictional. It cannot be waived and the case should and MUST be
dismissed at anytime this issue is brought to the attention of the
judge.
What is happening here? KD believes that such a serious violation
where both 2 Probate judges and 2 GAL’s and 2 Illinois licensed
attorneys are involved and everyone ignores jurisdictional notice
requirement of 14 day prior notice to a hearing to Gloria and the
sisters Yolanda and Josephine, especially when combined with 1) family
members reporting and insisting Mary G wants an attorney; 2) Mary G
asking Gloria to find KD who is her desired attorney and he is not
allowed to intervene (Gloria did NOT know that name before that
conversation–she got it from her mom); 3)the GAL’s say Mary waived her
right to an attorney; 4) the GAL’s say Gloria “consented” to an
agreement to appoint a guardian, etc. and the rest of the funny stuff in
the case (see my Table of Torts), the entire case looks like the old
days of Greylord.
Worst part about it is the case has gone on now for 2 years. Two
years and we have 6+ bar admitted Illinois lawyers spend time, resources
and estate money, holding an 93 year old woman in a place she has not
chosen–all because these 6 lawyers (2 judges, 2 GAL’s and 2+ lawyers for
the estate), don’t get the onerous and most serious burden of
jurisdictional notice.
And this is a serious continuing violation. Every day this case
goes on, the limitations period is NOT tolled for any of this tortious
ultra vires behavior that began in July of 2009. Day by day, each of
the lawyers involved that continue marching forward incur more and more
liability for themselves and the estate. None of them can apparently
pound their ego down (as I demonstrated yesterday that I can) and admit
that the entire Sykes matter is without jurisdiction, nonsuit it, let
Mary G go home, let Gloria go home, give Gloria back her Indiana frozen
funds and start the case all over.
Look at the FED cases. After 2 years of litigation, a long and
winding decision about how the RLTO should be interpreted regarding
numerous violations the parties protractedly argued about one short
sentence at the end said it all–the 5 day notice was only served by
slipping it under the door and therefore we MUST vacate the landord’s
judgment AND dismiss because the Circuit Court had no jurisdiction ab
initio.
Two years of protracted, heated litigation down the drain. Two
years. And in the end, due process won. The constitutional rights of
Illinois and US citizens won. These documents are not just scholastic
torture for the 6th grade kiddies–they are important legal documents
that should control the behavior of the courts instead of the other way
round.
No notice means no jurisdiction. The only way around this is to get a
signed waiver of the jurisdictional notice, and neither Gloria nor the
sisters Yolanda nor Josephine have signed such a document or told the
court that on a transcript record (you will be receiving each and every
one of these–you find the consent). Every one agrees on that.
KD is right to call for an investigation. That was and is his constitutional right.
He has recently transmitted to me additional law on this issue and I
will provide you with a memoranda, but from what I’ve seen so far, the
constitutional right to protect free public speech bearing upon public
issues is a “special” protected right of the highest demand for
absolutely no protections.
So then, why is this happening in the Sykes case, and why is there
anything wrong with Ken Ditkowsky calling repeatedly for an
investigation. He is old enough to recall the problems involved in
obtaining justice during the Greylord years. I was admitted the year
Greylord was over and 90% of the Daley Center was cleared of its corrupt
judges. I had heard corruption was so bad, the attorneys were openly
handing envelopes stuff with cash right over the bench and saying “Merry
Christmas” to these judges. And it was not once in a while, but for
years, and the ARDC sat by and did nothing, even with a barrage of
complaints from the public and other honest lawyers.
Since I have gotten to know KD he is one of the most honest, caring
lawyers that I have met. He has bent over backwards many times to help
Mary and Gloria obtain justice. Why pursue him?
Gloria says she was involved in the Gacy case and apparently the CPS
knew young boys were disappearing from their classrooms and did
nothing. She was one of the first investigative reporters on the case
right after Gacy was arrested. The CPS did not promptly inform parents
there was an apparent pattern. They did not inform the authorities so
perhaps a dozen or more boys died needlessly.
I know that no one likes to think our courtrooms are wired, or that
the authorities ignore the elephant in the room, but it’s people like KD
and myself and Gloria that are outraged at such conduct. We are
vociferous and will be vociferous, and if those loud protestations wind
up in a blog on the internet because the courts are wired and none of 6+
lawyers involved in that case simply “don’t get it”, and the ARDC turns
a blind eye and deaf ear, then so be it. That’s what we will all do.
And we are NOT going away, even after numerous 1983 violations, CPA
violations, etc. We will still be on the internet's door protesting so
the public knows what the govt is spending money on--deny human rights.
Look at the Probate file, see what Gloria is repeatedly filing to
protest her becoming homeless and penniless due to the behavior of the
above miscreants--and worst of all, denying her of her beloved
companionship of her elderly mother. She is right.
Thank you for your consideration and prompt cooperation in this matter.
Very Truly Yours,
DENISON & ASSOCS, PC
Joanne M. Denison
PS–I think it is just easier for you to get the PDF files by email, but
you said I could not email you anything yet on this case so I am faxing
it to be sure I have a return receipt.
PPS–if you are doing a lot of paper faxing, I have found efax.com where
you just get PDF files in your email is much better for longer faxes and
I get people to use that. And I don’t have to worry about anything
sitting unattended on the fax machine.
Cc: Ken Ditkowsky, via email
No comments:
Post a Comment