Hot off the presses, KD has just sent me his latest request to authorities for an investigation of the Sykes case.
But it's 26 pages of PDF so it won't fit here.
This is a Google Documents public file, so it's easy to view, read and download.
The attachments are (in case you have not yet seen these):
1. Memorandum of Ex parte communication by Cynthia Farenga to Judge Hollis, ND Ill. BK
2. KD Letter to ARDC dated 3/29/12
3. Exhibit 1: Farenga's actual letter to Judge Hollis (accuses KD of ghostwriting pleadings for Gloria when in fact Tim Lahrman, a layperson and friend wrote the document. further accuses KD of improperly filing Gloria's BK pleadings for her when the rules allow for it)
4. Gloria's email expressing concerns CF wants to dismiss Gloria's BK and CF got the BK changed to Chapter 11.
5. Counsel for Carolyn Toerpe "tells" the court which doctor to hire (presumably to sandbag a finding of incompetence). The doctor is clearly not independent.
6. Mary Sykes' letter to her attorney telling him she wants to make up her own mind and she wants everything split between her daughters 50/50. Carolyn took her mother to this attorney to get Mary's will changed and to benefit from the will in that she would get Mary's house 100% upon her death.
7. Carolyn Toerpe signed the Doctor's report "Carolyn Toerpe, PhD", when in fact she holds no PhD
8. Dr. Patel's letter that he would not sign a document saying Mary is incompetent. In fact he says she knows her mind but has some poor recall of past events.
8. Petition for Order of Protection against Carolyn (Petition was never heard and was ignored by the Probate Court--directly contrary to Illinois Law which prohibits the Respondent in a Petition for Protective order to seek Guardianship--of anyone).
9. Copy of trust wherein house is put in trust and Carolyn takes the house entirely upon the death of Mary via the terms of this Trust. Trust is invalid under statute of uses because Trustor and Trustee are the same--Mary G. Sykes. CT has been asserting the Trust is valid, when in fact it is not.
10. Next of Friends Lawsuit filed in ND Ill. Federal court--Complaint
11. Transcript of August 13, 2010 wherein Judge Connors asserts that she can invalidate any judgment anytime she wants. She tells the GAL's they do not have to follow sec 1401 procedure and file in the other judge's courtroom to attack the Lumberman's judgment.
12. Letter from Gloria to Rehab Assist--$1800 for consulting with 2 GAL's and lying about spoiled food in the refrigerator, when in fact Mary was sick at Carolyn's, lost 10 lbs or 10% of her body weight and Rehab Assist never reported that.
13. Lumberman's affidavit from Gloria's Lumerberman's attorneys.
14. Scott Evan's ARDC affidavit attesting to what KD said is in fact true and accurate regarding her case.
15. Gloria's Affidavit to the ARDC that what KD reported is in fact true and accurate--it lists numerous breaches of ethics, court procedures, safeguards and basically it tells a story of how Mary G "had" to be found incompetent, her house sold, so CF, AS, CT and her attorneys might profit from this evil cabal. Disgusting.
If you are interested in reviewing any of these documents, they are now public.
thanks
JoAnne
Although this is obvious, no person in this blog has been accused of any wrongdoing, crime or even arrested unless stated otherwise from a website reporting actual arrests and convictions. We are stating our opinions and we have the right to do this. Only the particular author is responsible for his or her content. (So don’t blame me if you dislike some posts from someone else. This site is newsworthy because it is picked up automatically by many other blogs and is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Illinois State Constitution and violations will be taken seriously with charges under the Illinois Citizens Participation Act. We ARE participating in government here–we are lawyers trying to make a difference to make things better for grandma and grandpa. We don’t care how much money you’re making–directly or indirectly from Probate or a nursing home or home health care wired-in business. Do yourself a favor and get a different job, it’s not worth it. And if you're someone filing ARDC complaints against this blog, we are all exercising our rights to disseminate important news to protect the rights of the elderly and respect their wishes. Again, go get another job--it's not worth it.
PS – This blog is primarily for entertainment purposes only and please don’t file any pleadings or documents in court without checking with the sources for errors. And I promise not to charge CF or AS more than my published hourly rate of $300 per hour. We take credit cards and paypal on our website. Another teeheehee. Sorry, but portions of this blog have to be entertaining so we can get the word out. There is most certainly a great deal of (stinging) truth in it, esp. for the GAL’s, the probate court and a society that ignores (thereby condoning) the sleazy world of probate, and in particular the 18th floor of the Daley Center in Chicago, but everyone needs to understand, these are not pleadings, there is no Motion, Response and Reply set by any court, together with extended legal argument recorded by a court reporter and subject to a Motion to Reconsider if errors or new evidence is found. So don’t take it that way. Like a good reporter, do your own due diligence and check with the sources first. Honestly, I have to explain blogs to attorneys? Have they no life? Do they not know how to email me or use the “comments” section at all?
No comments:
Post a Comment